I was just browsing through CGSociety and came across a guy who creates monochrome sci-fi images. Which is not something I really had considered. Sci-Fi should be bright and colourful. Or at least dark and colourful. So I took some of my favourite CG images and ran them through Lightroom. Not totally unhappy with these, give an alternative feeling to them. They use the same Lightroom filter that I created to convert photos.
Today, I’m feeling more myself and so we took a quick trip to Hope, Indiana to visit a cemetery Gale had read about.
It was fine and I took a few snaps. On the way home we stopped at a cemetery in Flat Rock. I think it’s Morristown, but Gale would know better. This was actually more conducive to photography and the sun was playing hide and seek behind a cloud.
I took a lot of photos at both places. I wasn’t blown away by any of them at the time, but since I’m still on this split-tone kick, I thought I’d try it on some of them. I’m slightly happier in monochrome.
Black and white photography. Gotta love it. With an absence of color the mind can concentrate on shapes, shades and contrast.
But you can do more than just remove color from a photo. You can tint the monochrome to a slight color, brown to give an aged look, blue to give a cold look. Or split-tone. This is a way of tinting highlights and lowlights to a subtle color. Back in the olden days of film, it would be accomplished by using different chemical baths that reacted differently depending how exposed the print was. Digitally, it’s much easier and less smelly. In this case I’ve tinted the highlights to blue and the lowlights to red.
See how the dark clouds around the edge have a slight red tinge and around the cross are more blue? Neat huh? It adds more dynamic to an otherwise monochrome image.
Gale got a new camera a while back. Her first full frame. Big deal I thought. Is a full frame really that different?
YES IT IS
When I first looked through it I couldn’t stop laughing. Not that it’s funny, but just what a difference it makes. I literally did a double take. She has a 17mm lens and I’m sure it has a 90 degree field of view. Actually I just looked it up, it’s 93 degree! For comparison, my 40D was 67 degrees with the same lens! This is HUGE!
But it meant that I got her 40D for a great deal. I was happy, she was happy, we was happy.
Until it broke. I was taking shots of flowers and it shuddered, gurgled and stopped. Then all it would do was give an ERR99, which is a generic fault for a million different things. I suspect it was the curtain lens busted. $200+ repair. Or I could just spend the extra and get a 6D.
So I did.
Today we are going to Crown Hill to try it out. her with her fancy 17mm and me with my 50mm (which I love)
FYI on my old camera my 50mm acted like an 84mm which gave me a 24 degree field of vision and now gives me 40 degrees!
I’ve played around with HDR before. Both in Photoshop and with Photomatix. The usual way is to take three shots at different exposures and then use the app to combine them into a tonemapped image. The problem is, that without a tripod, it’s really tricky to keep the camera still for all three shots. The program will do what it can to line the shots up, but they are never perfect.
What would be better would be to use a single RAW file and create the three under, normal and over exposed images. In photoshop you can do this with camera raw and then combine those three images into an HDR file.
Photomatix has a SINGLE SHOT option which does it for you. So I tried that today. The shot on the left is the regularly exposed image and the one on the right is the HDR Image created from it. Not too shabby. Maybe not as good as a real bracketted shot, but hard to tell unless you were to compare the two.
Just another option for creating HDRI after the fact (when you didn’t think about it at the time of taking the photo).
Back in June of 2003 I placed two letterboxes in woods near Tunbridge Wells. One was quickly removed. I hid it behind a wall and think the land owner probably removed it.
The other one, however, remained in place. This trip I checked on it, as you may have read in a post from a few weeks back. After 12 years it’s not in great shape. The stamp and pad are going and the pages have several forms of fungus and mold. I had planned to transplant it to America, but having watched The Strain, I’m worried that I may introduce some pathogen to the colonies.
In order to preserve all the stamps I collected from people that found it, in creating this album.
You may have heard me talk about letterboxing before. If you haven’t and don’t know what it is, here’s a quick run down (via Wikipedia) –
Letterboxing is an outdoor hobby that combines elements of orienteering, art, and puzzle solving. Letterboxers hide small, weatherproof boxes in publicly accessible places (like parks) and distribute clues to finding the box in printed catalogs, on one of several web sites, or by word of mouth.
Individual letterboxes contain a notebook and a rubber stamp, preferably hand carved or custom made.
Finders make an imprint of the letterbox’s stamp in their personal notebook, and leave an impression of their personal signature stamp on the letterbox’s “visitors’ book” or “logbook” — as proof of having found the box and letting other letterboxers know who has visited. Many letterboxers keep careful track of their “find count”.
We’ve found quite a few Letterboxes, both over here and over there and I even placed one in Kent about 10 years ago.
Gale and I are off to Britannia soon, to Dartmoor (among other places), the birthplace of Letterboxing. We wanted a unique stamp, but carving is tricky and you have to be pretty good to get a decent stamp.
But guess what? Gale has a 30watt laser engraver sitting in our spare bedroom. So she ordered some laser engravable rubber and dumped it on my desk with a “work this out” kind of look.
A few Googles later and a quick read of the laser manual and I powered up Corel Draw and came up with a design.
Sent it to the laser and then sat and watched a rubber stamp appear before my eyes.
We’re pretty pleased with the result and once we’ve finalized the design (Gale wants more stars) we will be ready to go find us some Letterboxes.
If you have any interest in finding Letterboxes near you, check out AtlasQuest which is not great looking, but has a lot of information on how to start.
OK Kids, back in the olden times we didn’t have fancy smart phones that could take panoramic photos. We had to do it the old fashioned way, down a mine, for 16 hours, after a 14 mile hike.
In 2005 we went to Paris and I, of course, took a photo of the Eiffel Tower. But to get it all in frame with the cheap camera I had I had to stand about 5 miles away. So instead I took 4 shots with the intent to stitch them together in Photoshop. 9 years later and I’ve still not done it.
I was looking through my photos and came across them and thought I’d give it ago. Guess what? Photoshop does all the hard work for you. just chuck multiple photos at it and you get a perfectly stitched panoramic image. I know where the joins are and I can’t see them.
Is FREE right now.
I’ve never heard of these filters, but free is good, right? Worst case, I uninstall it.
So far, I like it. It’s a photo filter and enhancer. I won’t use 80% of the filters, but the photo effects and contrast modifiers are pretty nice.
Here’s an example:
Sharper, more contrast and more detail. And just one click. Totally worth the FREE price tag.
The app works in Photoshop and Lightroom but if you don’t have either you can use it as a standalone app too. The image management isn’t as good as Lightroom. But, and I say it again, it’s FREE! If you are an avid photographer I really suggest you check it out.
Go get it HERE before the offer runs out.
So off to the park we trot, hoping for something worth snapping. Maybe the white-tailed squirrels which play there. It seems they are camera shy. However, when we got home, Gale noticed the duck on the retention pond had a baby with her. So I wandered over and took a few shots. Bear in mind, the camera is new to me and I haven’t quite worked out where are the settings are. It’s a great camera and does a lot of things I really like which my old one wouldn’t. I have always said that more mega pixels doesn’t make a better picture. The sensor and the lens make a better picture. But having 10.1 megapixels certainly helps. It’s also quicker to take rapid shots. AND it tethers directly to Lightroom and to my tablet! Going to be great for our trip to England.
Here are the photos. The sun was low and bright, which didn’t help and ducks move, a lot, and I’m still learning the camera. But still cute.